3 ms·
Because Mozilla is supposed to be an alternative to Microsoft, Google, Apple,.. and not just "the same but with less money".
by smsm42 4y ago
Because Mozilla is supposed to be an alternative to Microsoft, Google, Apple,.. and not just "the same but with less money".
- 878654Tom 4y agoAnd how does this acquisition change that?
- smsm42 3y agoIt shows that there's no strong-focused mission. Which is ok for a generic shareholder company - ultimately, not many care how exactly the profits are achieved, as long as there are profits. But less ok for a purposeful non-profit.