7 ms·
> what about parents who want to view porn but don't want their kids to That was specifically addressed in my post. Temporary disable. Remember that safe guar
by maerF0x0 4y ago
> what about parents who want to view porn but don't want their kids to
That was specifically addressed in my post. Temporary disable.
Remember that safe guards dont have to be perfect before being implemented. They just need to be better than the status quo. The status quo right now is 10 year old kids viewing porn and thinking that's what average intimate loving relationships look like.
- freedomben 4y agoYeah the temporary disable isn't my complaint. That's not the worst part. My criticism is the system in place after the parent has made the choice. As a parent, do you choose your own freedom or to protect your children? Most will choose the latter and basically have to choose "abstinence" for themselves for many years. It's a pretty sucky choice to have to make given that such an artificial and unneccesary choice is being forced on them by the legal system and their ISP.
- maerF0x0 4y agoMy point was at the moment of choosing they could either open the entire connection to $CONTENT or open the device (MAC address, DHCP assigned IP) up (afaik most ISPs control the router too) for traffic to those sites. What I'm suggesting does not require abstinence from those who have the password.