10 ms·
I notice that Mojo still seems to use numpy or something that looks "numpyish" for compatibility. Will Mojo also have an alternative syntax for doing things lik
by UncleOxidant 4y ago
I notice that Mojo still seems to use numpy or something that looks "numpyish" for compatibility. Will Mojo also have an alternative syntax for doing things like matrix multiplication that looks more native like Julia's?
- chrislattner 4y agoMojo fully supports arbitrary library designed types, check out the note books for examples that define custom matrix operations of various types.
- byt143 4y agoHow does mojo handle function polymorphism and abstraction? Julia uses multiple dispatch, Haskell type classes etc Edit: I see you're going to have protocols/ traits. Can those be specializes/monomoprhized at function call time like Julia abstract types? And how about function specialization? Will functions be attached to structs in a single dispatch fashion or free floating multimethods?