4 ms·
Employees have been prevented (by rule) from doing things that would make them more productive for a long time. For a trivial example, programmers who are profi
by tjr 3y ago
Employees have been prevented (by rule) from doing things that would make them more productive for a long time. For a trivial example, programmers who are proficient in Emacs not being allowed to install and use Emacs.
I still fail to see why employees will now choose to disregard this particular rule, and either disobey or quit.
- EFreethought 3y agoHonestly, "no Emacs" is one rule that would make me quit.
- ParetoOptimal 3y agoSo would I. Funnily enough I thought it might happen at a job in the past so I've thought through the "would you quit if work banned Emacs" question quite a bit.
- ParetoOptimal 3y ago> For a trivial example, programmers who are proficient in Emacs not being allowed to install and use Emacs. I'm not sure how you mean trivial here, but not being able to use emacs isn't a trivial matter to emacs users :) > I still fail to see why employees will now choose to disregard this particular rule, and either disobey or quit. I fail to see why employees follow rules that make no sense rather than disobeying or quitting.