3 ms·
> Up to 35000x faster than Python If their language is Turing complete, then I'd bet there are things Python does 35000x faster than Mojo too.
by smoldesu 4y ago
> Up to 35000x faster than Python
If their language is Turing complete, then I'd bet there are things Python does 35000x faster than Mojo too.
- canadianfella 4y ago[dead]
- marssaxman 4y agoHow do you figure? It seems entirely plausible to me that one could design a slightly-less-dynamic language, using Python-compatible syntax, which meets or outperforms Python on every benchmark which can be written in both languages.
- More-nitors 4y agohow is it related to turing-complete? I mean, if python has some unnecessary performance-killing while loops hidden inside, it can be 35000x slower for everything regardless of 'turing-complete'
- trenchgun 4y agoNon sequitur. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non_sequitur