> "shouldn't we research the effects of internet pornography in kids before allowing them unlimited access to it?" Is that a rhethorical question? People of al

> "shouldn't we research the effects of internet pornography in kids before allowing them unlimited access to it?" Is that a rhethorical question? People of all ages capable of using it already have mostly unlimited access to the internet (and thus to porn). Sans parents understanding the internet more these days, and trying to set limits and failing. Question should be whether somebody should do research before trying to limit access state/country wide in various ways. Ie. bigotry vs some informed decision making.