3 ms·
You have made your point, 3 times the same one, but you are yet to discuss mine. "We should solve coal immediately": Who is "we" (I for one don't have coal at
by mrpopo 3y ago
You have made your point, 3 times the same one, but you are yet to discuss mine.
"We should solve coal immediately":
Who is "we" (I for one don't have coal at home)
How can coal be "solved"?
Coal is in India, China, US, etc. I don't live in these countries and try not to buy anything from these countries anyway. My country has given up on coal completely. The only country from the top 3 that has enough economic leeway to transition quickly and completely is the US, and that would be "only" 8% of the total share, which by your logic would be not worth looking into, since 10 years of Chinese coal is 50 years of American coal, or something.
I absolutely think we should work on reducing coal usage as much and as quickly as possible, but it's out of my capacity. However, I can give up/reduce flying, and that's what I am doing.
- melling 3y ago“I can give up/reduce flying, and that's what I am doing” That’s completely meaningless. It accomplishes absolutely nothing. Climate change isn’t slowed. This is one of those problems where we need to fix the big problems. And we need to fix it globally.
- mrpopo 3y agoOK thanks for the life lesson. I think what you're doing is completely meaningless too.