4 ms·
>> you can mostly assume that the paper is valid you should check this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replicat
by abdou4a 3y ago
>> you can mostly assume that the paper is valid
you should check this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging or P-hacking
and many more...
- dmbche 3y agoYes! I'm well aware of the replication crisis. While this is valid, this shouldn't make us paranoid of all papers. If it's a paper out of your expertise, it's unlikely that you would be able to catch problems with it that the peer review process wouldn't have caught. So in practice, it doesn't really change the way you interact with papers - it should change the way people write them and how the peer review process works.