> "Hack affecting 836 subscribers lasted for more than a month before it was discovered." The intrusion lasted that long and only data of 836 subscribers was a

> "Hack affecting 836 subscribers lasted for more than a month before it was discovered." The intrusion lasted that long and only data of 836 subscribers was affected? That's a weirdly low figure for having over a MONTH of access to their systems. What did they hack, a barely used fax-machine?