3 ms·
Of my last 4 customers, three are using Bitbucket, one is using GitHub. One is using Bitbucket's Pipelines (never head about), one Semaphore (same thing), one T
by pmontra 4y ago
Of my last 4 customers, three are using Bitbucket, one is using GitHub. One is using Bitbucket's Pipelines (never head about), one Semaphore (same thing), one Travis (with GitHub), one runs tests locally and deploys from a self-hosted TeamCity instance. Almost every single external package all those four customers use has its repository on GitHub.
- emunday_bbc 4y agoHey - when you say you 'Never head about' in relation to Bitbucket Pipelines, do you mean you'd never heard that Pipelines was a product that was available as part of Bitbucket? Asking as I took over as the PM for Bitbucket Pipelines around 6 months ago and have been working to make the case for us needing to do a lot more to make people aware of the capability as a lot think Bitbucket is just Git, not CI/CD as well.
- pmontra 4y agoFirst of all, sorry for the spelling mistake (head/heard.) You are correct, I didn't know about Pipelines. However I don't use Bitbucket myself. I only use it when a customer uses it and this was the first customer of mine that uses Pipelines. I remember that I setup a pipeline for a new project and it was easy to do it. In general I'm always surprised by the amount of different products that do the same thing and I never heard about. The diversity is good, my ignorance is bad. However there is a limit on the number of things one can use.
- emunday_bbc 4y agoThanks so much for taking the time to reply, little anecdotes like this do a lot to help me make the case for us needing a better brand. Completely understand where you're coming from re: the number of different tools. Obviously I'd love it if we were one of the one's people thought of when the topic of integrated Git + CI/CD came up, but that's on us to change the level of awareness.