4 ms·
Annoying virtue signalling. Its as pleasant as someone running around your town scraming "LOOK AT ME IM STANDING FOR THE MORAL THINGS".
by blueflow 4y ago
Annoying virtue signalling. Its as pleasant as someone running around your town scraming "LOOK AT ME IM STANDING FOR THE MORAL THINGS".
- couchand 4y agoTu quoque.
- blueflow 4y agoWas i shoving it into everyones face unwarranted or was i answering remram's question?
- arp242 4y agoSo should morals never enter any argument at all? I don't even agree with their stance on this particular topic, but this dismissive complaining about "virtue signalling" is considerably more egregious than listing reasons you don't like GitHub, which happens to include a moral argument.
- blueflow 4y agoDoes not using Github change anything about ICE or the contract? Pretty sure not. So what does proclaiming it even do? Its nothing but self-service. Plus its red vs blue US politics, which is also not very pleasant to know about.
- pessimizer 4y agoShould we vote with our wallets or shouldn't we? I'm confused.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- arp242 4y agoLike I mentioned, I don't agree with their position so I'm not going to defend it. I am only defending that it's a legitimate argument to make and that it can't just be dismissed as "annoying virtue signalling" and "screaming". You can do this with almost any argument if you try hard enough.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- remram 4y agoWho is virtue signaling? The article or the flagged comment above?
- blueflow 4y agoThat part of the article, not you.