4 ms·
If it were strictly a naming issue, taking down the repository is not an appropriate remedy. They would be demanding the name be changed. It's purely about pr
by meragrin_ 3y ago
If it were strictly a naming issue, taking down the repository is not an appropriate remedy. They would be demanding the name be changed. It's purely about protecting their revenue stream. They must believe it is just easier to roll over this one project than get their customers in line. I wouldn't be surprised if what their customers are doing is not specifically covered by any agreements and they have no way to force their customers to make changes.
- KyeRussell 3y agoSorry but this is well and truly into the realm of unsubstantiated and unrealistic conspiracy theory. OpenAI can basically do whatever the hell they want here. I imagine there might be more favourable terms for the big kids. But for your average Joe, OpenAI makes basically no commitment. OpenAI aren’t trapped. Not even remotely. You’re basically buying something at the local swap meet. I imagine that the terms via Azure are effectively the same in this particular regard, though I do understand them to be different in other ways.