4 ms·

> On top of that, GPT is not OpenAI trademark. Not yet, but they're definitely working towards it. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97733259&caseType=SERIAL

> On top of that, GPT is not OpenAI trademark. Not yet, but they're definitely working towards it. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97733259&caseType=SERIAL_NO&searchType=statusSearch https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97733259&caseType=SERIAL_...

kvetching 3y ago
they've really done a 360 on openness
- endisneigh 3y ago
  180*
  - ben_w 3y ago
    No, no, I'd say 360 is correct in this case. Possibly not deliberately correct, but it is IMO correct. Trademarks etc. are unavoidable, and also used by the Wikimedia Foundation, the Python Software Foundation, the Free Software Foundation, etc.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - RobotToaster 3y ago
    They're good at moonwalking
- helsinkiandrew 3y ago
  > they've really done a 360 on openness I don't think that's fair - I'd guess many (probably most) large, fully open source projects have trademarked their name/project to stop people using it for similar projects, scamming, and confusing users. GPT may have been a step too far for OpenAI but even the FSF agree on Trademarks: https://static.fsf.org/nosvn/licensing/2020/FOSSmarksv2.pdf https://static.fsf.org/nosvn/licensing/2020/FOSSmarksv2.pdf
- imdsm 3y ago
  I mean, they haven't. What does open mean to you? It isn't OpensourceAI. OpenAI have made ChatGPT freely available. They have opened up use of their models to regular people and developers. They have the most powerful LLM and it's open to use by anyone. In addition, they work in the open. They accept the criticisms and continue to work in the open. Also, FWIW, if they did a 360º on openness, they'd be going in the same direction. I think you mean 180º.