3 ms·

"It’s a long-buried part of South Korean history" This is factually wrong. The geopolitical driven sex trade is a big issue in common Korean discourse (e.g. new

"It’s a long-buried part of South Korean history" This is factually wrong. The geopolitical driven sex trade is a big issue in common Korean discourse (e.g. newspapers, social media, politics, etc). I would say that it and the historical victimhood native are overemphasized in Korean society. They are a strong country now, no need to ruminate in the past.

AndyMcConachie 3y ago
It's only long-buried to Americans. I barely follow South Korean discourse, but I've talked about this with my Korean friends on multiple occassions. It's also not a mystery for Okinawans who regularly protest about American soldiers raping Okinawan women. Nor is it a mystery why Phuket and Bangkok have a giant sex industry now. That sex industry got a huge boost from American soldiers during Vietnam. There was obviously prostitution in Thailand before the Vietnam War, but I've read at least two historical accounts about Thailand during the Vietnam War and they both talked about the influence of American GIs on the sex trade there. Hell. Contemporary Italian historians talk openly about American GIs raping Italian women in WWII. There is no mystery in any of this for the locals. It's just contemporary Americans that are ignorant.
- s1artibartfast 3y ago
  I don't think anyone educated on the topic really denies it. Rape is a relatively common human phenomenon, especially in Wartime. The parent post made a claim about the emphasis and relevance.
  - Haga 3y ago
    [dead]
  - s1artibartfast 3y ago
    Re haga: I think there's an important line between expecting something and condoning it. Rape is a predictable result of War for many of the reasons you mentioned, and should be understood as such. To do otherwise would be hiding from reality. However, that doesn't make it a good thing. It is something to be mitigated to the extent possible in the context of other objectives. Referring to complaints as yapping simply minimizes another aspect of the hell that is Warfare.
- hulitu 3y ago
  They were not raping women. They were bringing democracy. /s
- pyuser583 3y ago
  The West German government created a report on the incidence of rape by occupying powers. Investigators did massive interviews, surveys, etc. The numbers for non-Soviet troops were low enough one could claim the rapes would have occurred regardless of whether the war happened. An American soldier could be executed for raping a German woman. However, it was 100% legal for him to rape his wife. By separating them from the one woman they were allowed to rape, and surrounding them with women they were strongly forbidden from raping, the war might very well have decreased it.

AndyMcConachie 3y ago

It's only long-buried to Americans. I barely follow South Korean discourse, but I've talked about this with my Korean friends on multiple occassions. It's also not a mystery for Okinawans who regularly protest about American soldiers raping Okinawan women. Nor is it a mystery why Phuket and Bangkok have a giant sex industry now. That sex industry got a huge boost from American soldiers during Vietnam. There was obviously prostitution in Thailand before the Vietnam War, but I've read at least two historical accounts about Thailand during the Vietnam War and they both talked about the influence of American GIs on the sex trade there. Hell. Contemporary Italian historians talk openly about American GIs raping Italian women in WWII. There is no mystery in any of this for the locals. It's just contemporary Americans that are ignorant.

s1artibartfast 3y ago
I don't think anyone educated on the topic really denies it. Rape is a relatively common human phenomenon, especially in Wartime. The parent post made a claim about the emphasis and relevance.
- Haga 3y ago
  [dead]
- s1artibartfast 3y ago
  Re haga: I think there's an important line between expecting something and condoning it. Rape is a predictable result of War for many of the reasons you mentioned, and should be understood as such. To do otherwise would be hiding from reality. However, that doesn't make it a good thing. It is something to be mitigated to the extent possible in the context of other objectives. Referring to complaints as yapping simply minimizes another aspect of the hell that is Warfare.
hulitu 3y ago
They were not raping women. They were bringing democracy. /s
pyuser583 3y ago
The West German government created a report on the incidence of rape by occupying powers. Investigators did massive interviews, surveys, etc. The numbers for non-Soviet troops were low enough one could claim the rapes would have occurred regardless of whether the war happened. An American soldier could be executed for raping a German woman. However, it was 100% legal for him to rape his wife. By separating them from the one woman they were allowed to rape, and surrounding them with women they were strongly forbidden from raping, the war might very well have decreased it.