3 ms·
Isn't the conclusion here just begging the question? By the nature of number ranges there are infinitely many more wrong answers available to calculators perfo
by chownie 3y ago
Isn't the conclusion here just begging the question?
By the nature of number ranges there are infinitely many more wrong answers available to calculators performing addition and yet a simple ripple carry adder still promptly produces the correct output without lookahead, why this is compelling evidence?
Further, if it relied on internal state or lookahead why would it occasionally hallucinate appropriate tokens it wasn't provided?
- famouswaffles 3y agoArithmetic has a number of always applicable steps. Unscrambling does not unless one of those steps is "think". If you want to believe looking ahead is unecessary, be my guest lol. Humans would occasionally "hallucinate" words in too. For whatever reason(and this is verified independently of any of this), LLMs also appear to "get distracted"