3 ms·
The linked comment is a reiteration of the same thought in more words, it still makes the odd assertion against "random chance", you didn't even really give a r
by chownie 3y ago
The linked comment is a reiteration of the same thought in more words, it still makes the odd assertion against "random chance", you didn't even really give a reason except "it must be so"
- famouswaffles 3y agoCome to whatever conclusion you want lol. The point of the comment is that Blind probability, surface level probability is not enough. That should be clear enough.
- danaris 3y agoThe point of the responses to you is no one thinks it's blind probability. Constructing meaningful sentences out of words is literally the primary thing it's designed to do. Chance simply doesn't enter into the equation to any notable extent.
- famouswaffles 3y agoSurface level probability doesn't work either.