3 ms·
There us just something about the mistakes. Let me put it thid way, it nails down hands and faces great most of the time with stable diffusion for example, why
by _8j50 4y ago
There us just something about the mistakes. Let me put it thid way, it nails down hands and faces great most of the time with stable diffusion for example, why would that ever be an issue at any point if it understood what hands and faces were? If I didn't understand what a hand was or how to draw it,I would never get it right. But if I do get it right quite a bit because I understand what the object is, then it makes no sense for me to have a significant error rate where hands and faces are deformed.
An artist who knows how to draw hands and faces will never make that mistake, especially when self-correcting is so easy.
The only explanation is that it is approximating based on what it learned from the large swath of training data.
Kind of like if a human remembered answers to a multiplication table by memorizing every input,output and trend as opposed to knowing how to process the data within the rules of math and generate output. LLMs imo don't understand the rules of language and context they only approximate what a rule compliant system should output.
- nl 4y agoAs has been pointed out ad-nauseam, beginner human artists find hands very hard to draw too - and newer models aren't really making hand mistakes often. I've never seen significant or systematic errors with faces. It sounds a little bit like you haven't actually tried these tools. The kinds of errors you seem to think they make just aren't there in practice. I'd encourage you to try them out! > LLMs imo don't understand the rules of language and context they only approximate what a rule compliant system should output. This is an area I know a lot about. There are no real universal rules for English grammar. If you look at something like the Penn treebank you can see that English - as used by humans - is more exceptions than rules. The fact that LLMs outscore any rule based system merely means that our grammar rules are mostly things derived from how English is used in practice, not vice-versa.