You can't say... > Your suspicions are (almost entirely) unfounded ...and then say... > The software was real and worked, for some value of "worked." What d

You can't say... > Your suspicions are (almost entirely) unfounded ...and then say... > The software was real and worked, for some value of "worked." What does "worked" mean? The screenshots imply a LOT of functionality. Can it take a two-dimension table of data and generate a stacked bar chart? Can the word processor interleave and flow a varying number of columns of text correctly? Are there any useful tools for doing any of these things within a graphical interface? I'm not saying that basic tools don't exist, but I've not seen any screenshots showing typeface options, layout options, etc. I haven't seen anything that confirms that these documents could be made visually rather than using a markup syntax. If the Star really can do all these things, it's deserving of some serious exposure in the form of documentary film. These polaroids really aren't doing it justice. > except for 10 And 05?