None of those claims about the effects of social media hold up under inspection. They're all academic pseudo-babble. Look at the Haidt response to people pointi

None of those claims about the effects of social media hold up under inspection. They're all academic pseudo-babble. Look at the Haidt response to people pointing out his evidence of social media = suicides isn't robust; he doesn't argue the evidence actually is robust, he argues that censoring social media shouldn't require you to actually prove your case! These ideas are all motivated narratives by people who want to control the internet to try and re-establish the world where their intuitions are the only ones allowed to be expressed.