3 ms·
> AI is not “smarter” than human You personally can get access to GPT-4 which exceeds human ability on most tests. For the sake of argument, say that this stil
by ftxbro 4y ago
> AI is not “smarter” than human
You personally can get access to GPT-4 which exceeds human ability on most tests. For the sake of argument, say that this still doesn't mean it's smarter than humans. Its training was finished nearly a year ago, and was nerfed before it was released to the public. Even if you think the pre-nerfed GPT-4 was still not smarter than humans, do you think the next version won't be? And you think the next version hasn't already been trained? If you think one smarter than humans doesn't exist yet, do you think that you will be immediately informed when it's created?
- celdon25 4y agoGPT4 is incapable of sharing opinions. If that is a technical limitation then that should answer your question. Do any of the other LLM models hold consistent opinions? I’m going to guess that’s a no. (Edit: also see https://twitter.com/MaartenSap/status/1587554332316119040 https://twitter.com/MaartenSap/status/1587554332316119040) GPT4 also cannot store and retrieve memory sequentially and iteratively in real time like humans can. There is a hard limit of a few pages of text. Then poof, memento. Sure, those memories can be synthesized over the next few months in a very costly process that starts with reading your chat histories. But it needs another breakthrough-level advancement before that’s on par with humans. So we are still some years off. https://twitter.com/bengoertzel/status/1639378920465395712 https://twitter.com/bengoertzel/status/1639378920465395712 I’m sure if the maestro himself were to chime in here he would be able to write a full book (literally) on why GPT4 is not AGI.