3 ms·
These links [1][2] provide some reasoning behind not using vendor extensions. The second is referenced in the article we're commenting on. I find it difficult
by lwhi 15y ago
These links [1][2] provide some reasoning behind not using vendor extensions. The second is referenced in the article we're commenting on. I find it difficult to understand why much vitriol needs to be expended.
[1] http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_pref.html http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_p...
[2] http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2012/02/09/CALL-FOR-ACTION:-THE-OPEN-WEB-NEEDS-YOU-NOW http://www.glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?post/2012/0...
- chc 15y agoThat QuirksMode article you posted includes an update acknowledging that it's wrong. I think the stance in the newer post it links to is more reasonable, though I'm still not sure it's all the way there.
- lwhi 15y agoThe article provides a summary of potential problems with vendor prefixes, which still stands. The author acknowledged that his suggested solution was wrong. See the redux [1] (which is actually mentioned in the article) for alternative solutions. My main concern is that the dcurt.is article misses the point entirely. [1] http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_pref_1.html http://www.quirksmode.org/blog/archives/2010/03/css_vendor_p...