True, but I consider this very hacky, error-prone, and unnecessary when a clear, bespoke test flag exists. Also, if you prefer the "[ ... ]" syntax for testing

True, but I consider this very hacky, error-prone, and unnecessary when a clear, bespoke test flag exists. Also, if you prefer the "[ ... ]" syntax for testing, then you can use `-v` directly anyway (since that is equivalent to the builtin test keyword anyway).