Quick search says 1.2kg/kWh theoretical max: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0042207X1830366X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artic

Quick search says 1.2kg/kWh theoretical max: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0042207X1830366X https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00422... Each ozone molecule at 48g/mol I think will map to 2/3 of an ammonia molecule at 17g/mol. So you’d get 0.23kg NH3/kWh. And I found a link saying the actual Haber Bosch energy usage requires 26GJ/ton which is 3.6kWh/kg or 0.27kg NH3/kWh: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/haber-bosch-process https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/haber-bosch... Anybody feel free to check my math. Worth noting actual Ozone yields are supposedly much lower than theoretical maxes at around 12% efficiency (which may require cryo temps and pure oxygen under pressure) bringing yield down to 0.03kg NH3/kWh. Doesn’t seem to take lower electricity in practice considering this is only one energy requirement vs the haber Bosch process counting the full energy input, though maybe it’s less capital intensive. I guess Ozone is deceptively hard to make because the little ozone generators we use as disinfectants require very little actual ozone to do their job.