2 ms·
These could have been 4x5 polaroids, they had pretty good quality, as good if not better than any 35mm or medium format print. As proof point, there was a type
by jboy55 3y ago
These could have been 4x5 polaroids, they had pretty good quality, as good if not better than any 35mm or medium format print.
As proof point, there was a type (50) where you could get a negative as well as a print. I don't recall being concerned about the quality of the negatives, the grain was pretty small. The only downside was the exposure to get a good negative wasn't one where you got a good print. So if it could get a good negative (2000dpi) for enlarging, it can make an awesome print (300-400dpi).