3 ms·

> If WH can't hire employees at a price point the market demands it won't operate - there will be no employees. Another way to say this argument is "the USA ec

> If WH can't hire employees at a price point the market demands it won't operate - there will be no employees. Another way to say this argument is "the USA economy requires a service sector of people inches from poverty in bad working conditions, to survive." If a country has to stand on the blood of its working class to survive, that country probably shouldn't exist. > People are willing to work at those rates so there will be a pool of employees available. The alternative is homelessness. This isn't ethical. Other countries have fast food restaurants with workers that have housing and healthcare. If the American government and corporate strategists can't organize its economy in a way to deliver this life to its citizens, it should be replaced, no? Unless you think "might makes right?"

brodouevencode 4y ago
> If a country has to stand on the blood of its working class to survive, that country probably shouldn't exist. You speak like zealot. I can't take any of this seriously.
- komali2 4y ago
  > I can't take any of this seriously. At your peril, I guess. What do you think the end result is of prices of rent and food going up, price of goods going up, and wages not moving?
  - brodouevencode 4y ago
    My peril? What does that mean? Markets work the way they work and will respond accordingly. The outcome may not be ideal but humans aren't always the most rational or predictable.
    - komali2 4y ago
      > My peril? What does that mean? It means it sounds like you aren't really interested in paying attention to this issue which means you may be blindsided by a recession or economic collapse. > Markets work the way they work and will respond accordingly. This doesn't really mean anything I don't think, I'm not really gleaning information here.