17 ms·
"No it isn't. It is labour." Is it? Farming is (historically) an optimized form of gathering that's transformed alongside crop consolidation and other efficien
by shanebellone 3y ago
"No it isn't. It is labour."
Is it? Farming is (historically) an optimized form of gathering that's transformed alongside crop consolidation and other efficiency gains.
Without land, farming cannot occur. Without laborers or equipment, farming can occur, but in a less efficient form.
Also, all monetizable "things" represent assets because they hold/produce value.
- andrepd 3y agoWithout land, farming cannot occur. Duh. But that's not what you're saying, you're saying "without privatised land, farming cannot occur", which is a trivially false assertion. >Also, all monetizable "things" represent assets because they hold/produce value. Yes, that is indeed the definition of asset: an ownable and tradable "thing". I fail to see the point.
- shanebellone 3y ago"But that's not what you're saying, you're saying "without privatised land, farming cannot occur", which is a trivially false assertion." The world's land is privatized. What ought to be has no relevance. Farming is asset-driven for that reason. I'm not debating what could be; only what is.