4 ms·
there is no “basic thing” mentioned in the article The "basic thing" is that the doctor didn't listen to his patient (i.e. the author). It's right here: What’
by qohen 3y ago
there is no “basic thing” mentioned in the article
The "basic thing" is that the doctor didn't listen to his patient (i.e. the author).
It's right here: What’s more, why do too many of them not listen to their patients ― the most basic thing that should be a fundamental part of their practice?
(And the lack of listening is described in detail earlier during the chronology of events).
- wrycoder 3y agoI’ll accept that, but I’m thinking that the editor tried to create a better headline and gave up. Lack of listening is possible, but the reason for ignoring the massive blood loss in the presence of a highly likely causative factor is not understandable. Incompetence isn’t enough - they must be been considering economic factors, i.e. insurance issues.