I’ll call them marketing: writing collateral, commentary, discussion of products politics etc. All forms of writing that are not really subject to validation a

I’ll call them marketing: writing collateral, commentary, discussion of products politics etc. All forms of writing that are not really subject to validation and can appeal to emotion more than rational/factual analysis. It will put a whole lot of such writers out of work although I hope there is an increase in editing as people tend to “hallucinate” less. This change might undercut the value of things like movie and product reviews as they’ll be quickly and seemingly accurately created. Assuming there’s a scan for misused words or inverted meanings, a quick read won’t distinguish which side of the Turing test they’re on. And a common response to this is to disregard the lot to save time and effort. Coupled with realistic animation, it might wipe out newsreaders as well as their writers. Similarly, actors and scriptwriters might be priced out of most work. But, as with other forms of automation, a net loss of jobs leads to a loss of economic activity and social stress. Language models aren’t good consumers.