I'd agree with you. My sentence was bad in that it oversells that book. That book is merely one baby step in the right direction. As excited as I am about Mins

I'd agree with you. My sentence was bad in that it oversells that book. That book is merely one baby step in the right direction. As excited as I am about Minsky's hypothesis that the brain is a society of agents, your point is the more important one that the process is more important. I also think Minsky would have agreed with you. His process seemed to be the Feynman "What I cannot create, I do not understand" approach. His thoughts on the brain were developed from building robots and multi-agent simulations and AI. Whereas the DSM says "here are the conditions, take this pill, pay us", he would say "we have no idea, let's keep building until we understand".