I don't think that's what the article says: > LeCun expresses an engineer's concern that without true intelligence, such programs will ultimately prove brittle

I don't think that's what the article says: > LeCun expresses an engineer's concern that without true intelligence, such programs will ultimately prove brittle, meaning, they could break before they ever do what we want them to do. > "You know, I think it's entirely possible that we'll have Level 5 autonomous cars without common sense," LeCun told ZDNET, referring to the efforts of Waymo and others to build ADAS (advanced driver assistance systems) for self-driving, "but you're going to have to engineer the hell out of it." I think the discussion in the article is focused on "actual problems".