He is a potential whistleblower. Your linked article says: "[My client] would like to make protected whistleblower disclosures to Congress." "[T]here are no sp

He is a potential whistleblower. Your linked article says: "[My client] would like to make protected whistleblower disclosures to Congress." "[T]here are no specific examples provided to support the accusations." I don't understand the tone of this post. I guess the implication is that whistleblower support relies on the political leanings of the people involved? Is it my politics talking if I say that the scale of this argument is completely underwhelming to me given the level of true atrocities being committed in the world? The article details 'incredible' examples of retaliation. That's the biggest concern here, not the whistleblowing.