3 ms·
Straight from Wikipedia, which is an objective source for such a general topic. Religious morality is a sub-category, not all of morality itself. https://en.m.
by yunohn 3y ago
Straight from Wikipedia, which is an objective source for such a general topic. Religious morality is a sub-category, not all of morality itself.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality
- smitty1e 3y agoWhat I'm after is that much of the ethics by which our legal system operates, e.g. a BAC limit for legal driving, is divorced from moral questions such as: "Is drinking beer a sinful act?"
- yunohn 3y agoI think you’re gravely misguided. BAC has nothing to do with sin, it’s connected to the morality and ethics of putting your fellow citizens at risk of your impaired driving.
- smitty1e 3y agoIndeed, this is the point I'm after. Glad we could get there.
- yunohn 3y agoMy repeated point has been that morality != religious sin, rather the latter is a subset. I don’t necessarily agree with laws/taxes in this regard, but it’s important to understand where they come from.
- smitty1e 3y agoOK, I disagree with the "subset" point, though I yield to your majority opinion on the matter. My argument is that we can declutter discussion by treating all "moral compass" arguments as orthogonal to an "ethical plane". If our subjective judgements are treated as internal (booze==sin), and de-conflicted from the external, legal arguments, we'd be in better shape. But too many are invested in the status quo to tidy up the model like that.