3 ms·
I see your point, and agree it might be painful. it depends on the promises the maintainer makes to themselves and to their users. I'd rather break the build a
by DyslexicAtheist 3y ago
I see your point, and agree it might be painful.
it depends on the promises the maintainer makes to themselves and to their users. I'd rather break the build and get immediately alerted by (hopefully moderately) upset downstream packagers than having this warning become visible in my users builds.
It isn't just about getting rid of a warning, but the new compiler has changed some important logic so this warning might highlight potentially undefined behavior. Am I, the maintainer OK with that - that is the main question I believe.
Might be useful to do regression with any new compiler being released especially when a product is used in safety or security critical systems.
- rwmj 3y agoThe trouble is a downstream packager might be compiling the whole distro -- 1000s of packages -- and they're not in a position to fix a new warning somewhere deep inside a program they don't know and probably don't use. They are more likely to hack the build system to add -Wno-error while cursing the upstream project.
- DyslexicAtheist 3y agofair point