4 ms·
Yes, it's the prerogative of a company to not want its work environment to be polluted with discussions that have no relationship to the tasks at hand. It is h
by leansensei 3y ago
Yes, it's the prerogative of a company to not want its work environment to be polluted with discussions that have no relationship to the tasks at hand.
It is human-focused to not pussyfoot around such decisions but to instead bring clarity to the table and allow humans to make their choice.
More companies should be like that and, in fact, in Europe, still are.
- madeofpalk 3y ago> no relationship to the tasks at hand. > It is human-focused Human-focused, as long as the human is white and male. When you make a communications service, you probably want to involve a wide range of perspectives to make sure you build a good product that doesn't contribute harm. Specifically with Hey, they've walked back a bunch of features (props for being reactive, I guess) after they got a modicum of feedback from people that don't look like the two founders. - https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1275991097261449216 https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1275991097261449216 "This is a great and important perspective we hadn’t considered" is a stunning example - You don't need to (and can't!) personally consider every perspective, but maybe if you involved more people in the product development process you get to catch these things before you release them. Human-focused. - https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1275595820121776128 https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1275595820121776128 - https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1276173017060569089 https://twitter.com/dhh/status/1276173017060569089
- sickcodebruh 3y agoDo you know how many people they did have working on this, or what people specifically were lacking to catch these? Do you have insight into what major problems they caught before release that they public never saw?