4 ms·
> She was waiting a whole year to sign the bill and at the end decided add loopholes which made the bill worse than useless. So what’s with this 10 day timefra
by nier 3y ago
> She was waiting a whole year to sign the bill and at the end decided add loopholes which made the bill worse than useless.
So what’s with this 10 day timeframe? I’m confused. So, technically, they haven’t been waiting a year and vetoed the bill right away?
- LegitShady 3y agomost likely there was some shenanigans within the legislature to hide exactly who did what, which shouldn't be possible given freedom of information rules, but if it was vetoed that would leave a record that doesn't exist. Most likely it was never officially submitted until after changes occurred.