3 ms·
> you're explicitly taking on the maintenance burden How are you not taking the burden of maintenance when writing code that uses private-by-convention propert
by ricardobeat 4y ago
> you're explicitly taking on the maintenance burden
How are you not taking the burden of maintenance when writing code that uses private-by-convention properties? The difference seems pretty abstract, a fork will require the same rework when internal properties change.
- Nullabillity 4y agoYes, accessing the internal parts is taking on the burden. Forking is acknowledging that you have done so.