4 ms·
> The sources <snip> asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential. The "sources", who know the information is confidential, spill the beans an
by robomartin 4y ago
> The sources <snip> asked not to be identified because the matter is confidential.
The "sources", who know the information is confidential, spill the beans and expect their identity to remain...confidential. In other words, they want others to treat them with the respect they presumably agreed to have for the information they willingly disclosed. Remarkable.
The case of someone reporting criminal activity is very different. In that case you want people to come forward with information and they must be protected. BTW, the Wikipedia page on whistleblowers is interesting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_whistleblowers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_whistleblowers
- blitzar 4y agoIts pretty obvious to me that the "sources" are the Investor Relations team at Arm and "leaking" the confidential information was done with permission all the way to the top. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_balloon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_balloon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability
- robomartin 4y ago> Its pretty obvious to me that the "sources" are the Investor Relations team at Arm and "leaking" the confidential information was done with permission all the way to the top. How is this obvious? The links you provide do not contain any evidence at all.
- taskforcegemini 3y agoprobably because it is in the interest of arm, for people intersted in investing in arm to have that information