Honestly I have been shaking my had about he many comedians and new papers have negatively reported about it, because it's short sighted and blinded by some abs

Honestly I have been shaking my had about he many comedians and new papers have negatively reported about it, because it's short sighted and blinded by some absurd degree of perfectionism. Sure it's not perfect, by far. But it's a major improvement. And you don't build a city in a day, you build it bit by bit incrementally. For example yes, the 49€ ticket doesn't to allow you to take a dog or bicycle with you (consistently never; some metro trains just happen to not require tickets for dogs at all). But would you prefer to have a 49€ ticket today, or wait another 3 years until they perfectly discussed out all the nitty bitty details of transporting things which are not humans but consume human sized space? Instead you get the ticket today _while they work on a extension ticket for bicycle and dog transport_. Similar yes there is a very small number of regional (non metro) lines which are labeled in a way where it seems to be valid (they are RE lines) but is not. But this is mainly the reason due to how exactly the contracts for this lines have been made. Contracts which get renewed every few years at which point you can either fix this or give them different names. Why should the ticket wait halve a year or more until all of the contracts are renewed just to fix this? (Also non of this lines are major line, they always have similar alternatives alternatives AFIK.) It's like getting a good car for free and then complaining for days that the backseats are quite bit worn down, just ridiculous. Through they need to put a bit more work into providing easy to find informational materials IMHO.