3 ms·

The point is that the patients is neither compete nor consistent.

by hgsgm 4y ago

flangola7 4y ago
[flagged]
- Toutouxc 4y ago
  I think they were trying to say "The point is that the patient's story is neither complete nor consistent." and it makes sense to me that way.
- KyeRussell 4y ago
  If you can’t deal with a one-character typo in a comment, then ChatGPT certainly has you beat. The bot paranoia is the icing on the cake. Calling this an “internal process” that’s none of your concern, a much more egregious wilful misrepresentation of this situation. There is a situation or phenomenon of human behaviour, this is how the healthcare system deals with it. Who are you as presumably some software person to come in telling them to knock the gate down without understanding why it was put there in the first place? God knows you’d hate it if someone did that to you in your area of expertise. I understand that the proliferation of VC-backed money-losing companies which parachute clueless software people into other domains have given developers an undue sense of transferable expertise, but perhaps exercise some self-awareness.
  - flangola7 4y ago
    You need to check your attitude and eat a big piece of humble pie. You will never get anywhere in life acting like a preachy know it all. If you are still thinking of making another snarky reply, then you truly are lost. Be a better person.
DangitBobby 4y ago
The main problem is when you take your medical history and current medications on a tablet on intake and then ask the same questions once you get in the room.
- salad-tycoon 4y ago
  I understand that you are of sound mind and likely above average intelligence and likely interested and capable of providing accurate and factual statements but… most people they see are not. People get their medications wrong just as likely as they get it correctly. This is in addition to many people being on complicated medication as regimens and/or just mostly disinterested in change. The questions are one thing, the reviewing with a person who make above assessments is still, for now at least, a human job.

The point is that the patients is neither compete nor consistent.

by hgsgm 4y ago

The point is that the patients is neither compete nor consistent.

flangola7 4y ago

[flagged]

Toutouxc 4y ago
I think they were trying to say "The point is that the patient's story is neither complete nor consistent." and it makes sense to me that way.
KyeRussell 4y ago
If you can’t deal with a one-character typo in a comment, then ChatGPT certainly has you beat. The bot paranoia is the icing on the cake. Calling this an “internal process” that’s none of your concern, a much more egregious wilful misrepresentation of this situation. There is a situation or phenomenon of human behaviour, this is how the healthcare system deals with it. Who are you as presumably some software person to come in telling them to knock the gate down without understanding why it was put there in the first place? God knows you’d hate it if someone did that to you in your area of expertise. I understand that the proliferation of VC-backed money-losing companies which parachute clueless software people into other domains have given developers an undue sense of transferable expertise, but perhaps exercise some self-awareness.
- flangola7 4y ago
  You need to check your attitude and eat a big piece of humble pie. You will never get anywhere in life acting like a preachy know it all. If you are still thinking of making another snarky reply, then you truly are lost. Be a better person.

DangitBobby 4y ago

The main problem is when you take your medical history and current medications on a tablet on intake and then ask the same questions once you get in the room.

salad-tycoon 4y ago
I understand that you are of sound mind and likely above average intelligence and likely interested and capable of providing accurate and factual statements but… most people they see are not. People get their medications wrong just as likely as they get it correctly. This is in addition to many people being on complicated medication as regimens and/or just mostly disinterested in change. The questions are one thing, the reviewing with a person who make above assessments is still, for now at least, a human job.