3 ms·
I don't even care if you're correct, but it's vital for the sake of the climate that we maintain a narrative This attitude is doing more damage than whatever p
by WillPostForFood 3y ago
I don't even care if you're correct, but it's vital for the sake of the climate that we maintain a narrative
This attitude is doing more damage than whatever possible misconception the parent comment had. It appears like you are acting on faith, not science. That you don't care about truth, but pushing an agenda.
- revelio 3y agoThey're only using the same strategy as climate academics themselves: the current diagram with the tree ring only data [Briffa’s] somewhat contradicts the [Mann] multiproxy curve and dilutes the message rather significantly. I know there is pressure to present a nice tidy story as regards 'apparent unprecedented warming in a thousand years or more in the proxy data' but in reality the situation is not quite so simple. What do you think would be the most effective way to radicalise the UN agenda and protect the climate from our current economic and political systems? There are plans for a team to work in USA on a parallel campaign. The new program [with people who disagreed] was "unacceptable" to King, says Peter Cox of the U.K.'s Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research in Exeter. "We knew that we would not get to the scientific issues if we went down every rabbit hole of skepticism." (all from climategate emails)