> None of the "AI" systems that have been making splashes in the news recently are very much like the human brain. Why do you believe that this is relevant? Ou

> None of the "AI" systems that have been making splashes in the news recently are very much like the human brain. Why do you believe that this is relevant? Our brain is just the product of natural evolution; running on hardware that is already incredibly inferior in several critical aspects (processing speed, bandwidth and information storage density), and the only holdout--computational power/watt--exists because we have no good way to compare it. Why would it be necessary or even helpful to COPY that biological implementation to achieve superhuman cognitive capabilities?