> Things like the Bitcoin Cash fork & DAO fork arguably set the precedent that the developers control the funds. The DAO fork is a good example, but the Bitcoi

> Things like the Bitcoin Cash fork & DAO fork arguably set the precedent that the developers control the funds. The DAO fork is a good example, but the Bitcoin Cash fork is not a good example as the developers did nothing with any of the funds. That was just a normal fork that created a new cryptocurrency. Maybe you're thinking of Craig Wright's own Bictoin fork, Bitcoin SV? > If you have established you will change the blockchain through a compelling, non-technical argument; and if _nobody_ presents the keys; but if you have the best compelling argument, they _probably_ belong to you. I get that it's what he's going for, but one of the keys he has claimed was his has already signed a message claiming Wright is a fraud: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2020/05/25/craig-wright-called-fraud-in-message-signed-with-bitcoin-addresses-he-claims-to-own/ https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2020/05/25/craig-wright-call...