3 ms·

So what exactly do you disagree about with the commenter? If it's equally speculative, then what's your point?

by ravenstine 4y ago

roflyear 4y ago
The more extraordinary claim is we're close to AGI not that we're far from AGI
dmbche 4y ago
Remember 2012? Both the people expecting the end of the world and the ones that were saying nothing was going to happen were speculating. We just need to stop giving attention to them, as it's just empty wind.
- hammyhavoc 4y ago
  Is this speculating or just parroting within the echo chamber? E.g., people who believed in 5G mind control, microchips in the COVID vaccines etc. They themselves just repeated what they heard. Like with the crypto hype cycle, people repeated all kinds of unfounded claims, but they themselves didn't come up with the idea. That the idea existed was all the "evidence" they needed for these things to be apparently true.
  - dmbche 4y ago
    I guess at that point it's operationally the same - wether it's someone parrotting it or someone that actually has the opinion, both are saying nothing of value, just like with covid microchips and 5g!
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- jacquesm 4y ago
  Either you're sarcastic or I fail to see those two as even remotely balanced. The world wasn't going to end. Neither will it end tomorrow morning at 9 am.[+] [+] And if it does good luck collecting on that ;)
  - dmbche 4y ago
    No - that's the point. There was no reason to believe the world was going to end, so the conversation is nonsensical. If someone was to begin arguing with you that it was going to end tomorrow and started raining you with blog posts and papers, what's the sensible thing to do? Just ignore em
Jackevansevo 4y ago
My only point was to dismiss the original commenter. It's not constructive to argue in a vacuum and completely ignore the argument points laid out by the author in the article.

3 ms·

So what exactly do you disagree about with the commenter? If it's equally speculative, then what's your point?

by ravenstine 4y ago

So what exactly do you disagree about with the commenter? If it's equally speculative, then what's your point?

roflyear 4y ago
The more extraordinary claim is we're close to AGI not that we're far from AGI
dmbche 4y ago
Remember 2012? Both the people expecting the end of the world and the ones that were saying nothing was going to happen were speculating. We just need to stop giving attention to them, as it's just empty wind.
- hammyhavoc 4y ago
  Is this speculating or just parroting within the echo chamber? E.g., people who believed in 5G mind control, microchips in the COVID vaccines etc. They themselves just repeated what they heard. Like with the crypto hype cycle, people repeated all kinds of unfounded claims, but they themselves didn't come up with the idea. That the idea existed was all the "evidence" they needed for these things to be apparently true.
  - dmbche 4y ago
    I guess at that point it's operationally the same - wether it's someone parrotting it or someone that actually has the opinion, both are saying nothing of value, just like with covid microchips and 5g!
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- jacquesm 4y ago
  Either you're sarcastic or I fail to see those two as even remotely balanced. The world wasn't going to end. Neither will it end tomorrow morning at 9 am.[+] [+] And if it does good luck collecting on that ;)
  - dmbche 4y ago
    No - that's the point. There was no reason to believe the world was going to end, so the conversation is nonsensical. If someone was to begin arguing with you that it was going to end tomorrow and started raining you with blog posts and papers, what's the sensible thing to do? Just ignore em
Jackevansevo 4y ago
My only point was to dismiss the original commenter. It's not constructive to argue in a vacuum and completely ignore the argument points laid out by the author in the article.