3 ms·
Yeah it's very good at answering basic questions which have been answered 50+ times on stack overflow &co that's for sure. I use it for my side projects, for t
by lm28469 4y ago
Yeah it's very good at answering basic questions which have been answered 50+ times on stack overflow &co that's for sure.
I use it for my side projects, for tech I have no experience in, and it works very well, because I know what I want, I know that it is possible and I just need it to vomit the boilerplate to save me 5 google searches
For my day job it's next to useless, and if your day job can already be automated by chatgpt I have bad news for you
- 2devnull 4y ago“if your day job can already be automated by chatgpt” If they can automate the work of a physician, who exactly is safe? Low skill labor, maybe, for awhile.
- meroes 4y agoThe remote physician misdiagnosed my X-ray last time. That physician is easily automated out and possibly for the benefit of the patients not just costs. The other staff involved, like the NP, X-ray tech, assistant, are fine for a lot longer.
- 2devnull 4y ago“are fine for a lot longer.” My point is that “a longer” implies “when” rather than “if”. Everyone is replaceable, in the long run.
- lm28469 4y ago> If they can automate the work of a physician, who exactly is safe? But they can't, it's like saying you're 15cl stove top italian coffe maker is replacing a starbucks tier coffee machine If the only metric you account for is "it makes coffee" boolean then sure, if you actually implement it you'll notice things falling apart in the first 10 minutes.