4 ms·
I'm not at all impressed by GPT yet. Sure it's doing things we've never seen before, but the hype exceeds the actual utility. It gets a lot of things wrong - a
by butterisgood 3y ago
I'm not at all impressed by GPT yet. Sure it's doing things we've never seen before, but the hype exceeds the actual utility.
It gets a lot of things wrong - and I mean a lot of critically important things. Can a physician be wrong? Yes, but I can sue the shit out of them for malpractice too. Whom do I sue for bad "parrot advice" when GPT goes off the rails?
- cubefox 3y agoRelated question: If a driver kills someone and it's his fault, he will presumably get large fines or even go to jail. But if the same thing happens with a self-driving car, whose faul is it then? The owner of the car? The car company? It seems nobody is really at fault, mistakes are just bound to happen eventually, and a car company can't go to jail anyway.
- butterisgood 3y agoCan't put them in prison but they are "persons" in many other ways. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
- rootusrootus 3y agoLiability for self-driving cars is a topic long discussed and still not completely resolved. Take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car_liability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-driving_car_liability for examples. The only level 3 system in production (that I'm aware of, at least) is Mercedes', and they have liability while the car is driving itself. It shifts back to the driver 10 seconds (IIRC) after the system notifies the driver he/she must take over.