> Anarchy would be without laws. And you don't see laws as antithetical to individual freedom? Anyone bound by a law by definition is less free. Paying someon

> Anarchy would be without laws. And you don't see laws as antithetical to individual freedom? Anyone bound by a law by definition is less free. Paying someone less than what is required for them to live in the area they work reduces my individual freedom because I end up forced to pay the cost of your laborer through social welfare programs. When you buy anything including labor you pay for its cost not its value to you. Is requiring food be safe to eat forcing someone to do labor they don't want to provide? If you don't like that a workplace has a union you're free work somewhere else. Unionized workplaces aren't forced to provide you the benefits of collective bargaining without joining. Liberty is way more complicated than you're making it and isn't fewer restrictions on individuals --> more feee.