3 ms·
The bible is not exactly a historical document. It's a collection of mythology with some loose basis in reality
by jghn 4y ago
The bible is not exactly a historical document. It's a collection of mythology with some loose basis in reality
- baremetal 4y agoCan you back that statement up or is that just your opinion?
- PrimeMcFly 4y agoI think the onus is on those who want to claim the bible is factual, actually.
- yarg 4y agoIt has a man who could: * Walk on water; * Turn it into wine; * Copy and paste fish and bread; * Heal lepers; * Die and come back to life. And asserts that he actually existed.
- crabkin 4y agoIt's a 4-D projection/Rubik's cube manual about personal development, the logos, and the formation, nurturing, and triumph of a society, despite going up against what seems to be impossible odds. Simply calling it mythology or tying it's value as history or any other ill-conceived standard of truth and guidance we have now is missing the point.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoThe Bible is a library, not a document. A collection of texts assembled over millennia. Some parts metaphors, some historic, some parts examples, etc.