7 ms·

I can imagine AI being module-based. Like with plug-ins or apps, call it what you will. So if you’re, say working in a hospital in a specific role, you will be

I can imagine AI being module-based. Like with plug-ins or apps, call it what you will. So if you’re, say working in a hospital in a specific role, you will be advised by an AI module for that specific system. Or if you are working in an OR with a specific surgical procedure every day, you will have an AI module active all day to augment your knowledge and deliver relevant information where it’s needed. It’s going to make some types of work immensely satisfying.

CuriouslyC 3y ago
Based on how things are unfolding in stable diffusion land, we're going to see general purpose base models that are then fine tuned for specific tasks using LoRAs that can be quickly loaded/unloaded as needed.
- orbital-decay 3y ago
  >LoRAs that can be quickly loaded/unloaded as needed No need to shuffle them around, you can combine different finetunes in one composition.
  - anotherhue 3y ago
    Kindof? But then, for high-risk cases like this you'd need to validate their combinatorial effect.
    - deleted 3y ago
      [deleted]
sebastianconcpt 3y ago
Correct, as long as they become ROI positive/business backed, one module per profession. In the future, this extends to robots, of course.
ricketycricket 3y ago
I work in a field related to surgeon education. Until the results of AI output can be guaranteed to be deterministic and proven to always be correct, the legal ramifications of an AI providing incorrect information or promoting off-label usage is likely insurmountable. There are dozens or hundreds of eyes that see this information before it is approved for use and weeks can be spent arguing over a single word.
- hutzlibu 3y ago
  If the doctor decides, and the AI is just a tool among many, then why is there a problem? I am very dissatisfied with current diagnosis analysis, as they are often wrong, as well. I really don't want an AI make medical decisions for me, but doctors are overworked and if AI can help spot things, they otherwise would have missed, then I really hope those tools won't be blocked for legal reasons.
  - prox 3y ago
    A kind of second opinion system might be good. The danger I see is that you become to relient on it. There is a great science fiction book (forgot the name!) where everyone forgot how things worked (and didn’t need to know!) because machines did all the work. It created this dystopia where people where immensely shallow and immature because all things just happened for them.
    - hutzlibu 3y ago
      "There is a great science fiction book (forgot the name!) where everyone forgot how things worked (and didn’t need to know!) because machines did all the work. It created this dystopia where people where immensely shallow and immature because all things just happened for them." Are you sure, that wasn't just a ordinary newspaper? At least I get that feeling quite often.
      - prox 3y ago
        Interesting observation :) Yeah, the mechanism is at work in various ways already if you think of it.

CuriouslyC 3y ago

Based on how things are unfolding in stable diffusion land, we're going to see general purpose base models that are then fine tuned for specific tasks using LoRAs that can be quickly loaded/unloaded as needed.

orbital-decay 3y ago
>LoRAs that can be quickly loaded/unloaded as needed No need to shuffle them around, you can combine different finetunes in one composition.
- anotherhue 3y ago
  Kindof? But then, for high-risk cases like this you'd need to validate their combinatorial effect.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]

sebastianconcpt 3y ago

Correct, as long as they become ROI positive/business backed, one module per profession. In the future, this extends to robots, of course.

ricketycricket 3y ago

I work in a field related to surgeon education. Until the results of AI output can be guaranteed to be deterministic and proven to always be correct, the legal ramifications of an AI providing incorrect information or promoting off-label usage is likely insurmountable. There are dozens or hundreds of eyes that see this information before it is approved for use and weeks can be spent arguing over a single word.

hutzlibu 3y ago
If the doctor decides, and the AI is just a tool among many, then why is there a problem? I am very dissatisfied with current diagnosis analysis, as they are often wrong, as well. I really don't want an AI make medical decisions for me, but doctors are overworked and if AI can help spot things, they otherwise would have missed, then I really hope those tools won't be blocked for legal reasons.
- prox 3y ago
  A kind of second opinion system might be good. The danger I see is that you become to relient on it. There is a great science fiction book (forgot the name!) where everyone forgot how things worked (and didn’t need to know!) because machines did all the work. It created this dystopia where people where immensely shallow and immature because all things just happened for them.
  - hutzlibu 3y ago
    "There is a great science fiction book (forgot the name!) where everyone forgot how things worked (and didn’t need to know!) because machines did all the work. It created this dystopia where people where immensely shallow and immature because all things just happened for them." Are you sure, that wasn't just a ordinary newspaper? At least I get that feeling quite often.
    - prox 3y ago
      Interesting observation :) Yeah, the mechanism is at work in various ways already if you think of it.