40 ms·
Before delving into this topic, it's important to differentiate between Starlink and Starshield[0]. Both offer end-to-end encryption. The latter serves national
by rumblefrog 3y ago
Before delving into this topic, it's important to differentiate between Starlink and Starshield[0]. Both offer end-to-end encryption. The latter serves national security purposes and thus demands more robust security measures.
When considering targeting a single satellite, note that Starlink's Ku-Band beam spans approximately 3 degrees[1]. Given their low-altitude orbits, individual satellites will move out of coverage within minutes, to be replaced by the next in line. Analogous to aiming at a static target is easy, but when the target is rapidly moving, it becomes much more difficult to target, not to imagine the hardware required. The challenge becomes almost insurmountable at certain cost scales when dealing with multiple, swiftly changing targets.
In addition, SpaceX is establishing LISLs[2] (Laser Inter-Satellite Links), where instead of communicating with a ground-station, the satellites can communicate amongst themselves which yields higher data rates, less interference, lower latency, and mostly importantly provides a higher security by eliminating the need for a ground-based intermediary. I was fortunate enough to tour Starlink's assembly factory and witness the development of LISLs firsthand - their work is truly impressive.
In terms of updating and patching the satellites, of course there's the traditional software patches applies. As for hardware updates, it's worth noting that Starlink satellites have about a 5-year lifespan. New satellites are frequently launched to join the constellation, presumably with the latest hardware patches, while older or malfunctioning satellites can be de-orbited.
[0]: https://www.spacex.com/starshield/ https://www.spacex.com/starshield/
[1]: https://fcc.report/IBFS/SAT-MOD-20181108-00083/1569860 https://fcc.report/IBFS/SAT-MOD-20181108-00083/1569860
[2]: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2103/2103.00056.pdf https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2103/2103.00056.pdf