4 ms·
First of all, talking about AI researching experience, I am an AI research who's in the field for over 10 years. Second, this is not the conclusion that's reach
by codermind 4y ago
First of all, talking about AI researching experience, I am an AI research who's in the field for over 10 years. Second, this is not the conclusion that's reached by me. There is a survey where 30% of AI researchers think it's likely that AI may be a threat to humans if we don't align it well.
Just give you another example.
"it is "not inconceivable" that AI may develop to the point where it poses a threat to humanity"
There are many other high profile researchers are voicing similar ideas.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- hammyhavoc 4y agoWhere can I read some of your research of the past decade?
- smoldesu 4y agoSubstack, apparently :P
- hammyhavoc 4y agoYou would have thought a self-proclaimed researcher would cite plenty of references in what they publish. Not one in what I looked at. Pretty shocking even by blogging standards, let alone scientific standards.
- codermind 3y agoThis substack is my low profile place so I am not planning to reveal my identity here. And what I said shouldn't be relevant to who I am. I don't think you should judge the content by who said it. You should judge it by if it makes sense :)
- codermind 3y agoAnd you seem to get distracted by if AGI will happen soon. My main point of the article is if AGI happens, it won't be just like chess bots. I didn't focus on if it will happen soon. But yes, I think it might happen in 50 years. And I might write another article about it!